At the end of this past week the general managers' meetings wrapped up down in Orlando, FL without many headlines outside of the signings of Curt Schilling, Omar Vizquel and Greg Maddux. Oh yea, and that collusion thing. You heard about that, right? About how Don Fehr and Gene Orza tried to pass matching kidney stones while thinking about Theo Epstein and Larry Beinfest's GM-only support group? Didn't hear? Well here's what that Dynamic Duo of the MLBPA had to say in their press release:
NEW YORK -- Over the past few days, press reports coming out of the General Managers' meetings relating to the sharing of information between clubs as to their plans regarding players potentially raise serious questions concerning the fairness and integrity of the free agent market. Such questions are amplified by reports stating that the Commissioner is attempting to influence the market for at least one player.
"Any such activity with respect to free agents is clearly improper," said Don Fehr, Executive Director of the Major League Baseball Players Association. "We expect to look into the situation, and are prepared to take the appropriate action to respond to any collusive behavior, and to make sure that the rights of free agent players under the Basic Agreement are fully protected." (MLBPA)
OK, this is a legitimate gripe. Considering all the troubles the Players' Association has had with trying to get their members the best possible treatment over the last 30 or so years, I don't think anyone can blame Fehr and Orza, as unlikeable a pair as has ever been seen in baseball, for getting their backs up. Here's the thing: by all accounts this was nothing like collusion.
Theo himself was reported to have essentially stood up and said, "Hi, my name's Theo, and I would really like to sign my third baseman." Brian Cashman is actually quoted as saying "I don’t have a third baseman. I need a third baseman.” (
New York Times) That's not collusion, is it? Here's what the current
Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA, in the future) has to say:
E. Individual Nature of Rights
(1) The utilization or non-utilization of [Free Agent] rights under Article XIX(A)(2) and Article XX is an individual matter to be determined solely by each Player and each Club for his or its own benefit. Players shall not act in concert with other Players and Clubs shall not act in concert with other Clubs.
collusion as being instances where clubs explicitly discussed potential payroll limitations and player desires as regards free agent signings in the This section of the CBA was interpreted by the original labor lawyer for the MLBPA, should-be Hall of Famer Marvin Miller on XM's "The Show" Friday afternoon. He further definiedoffseason. If Theo said, "I'll sign A-Rod for nor more than $10 million per year to a maximum of 5 years," and Cashman says, "I'll sign A-Rod for nor more than $11 million for 4 years," and it continues around the room, that becomes collusion for the simple reason that the use of the A-Rod's rights as a free agent are employed for the benefit of every club, as stating contract ceilings out loud to competitors limits the market for his services. As it stands, what was actually said at the meetings ("I need a third baseman, and I really would like Cy Young to anchor my rotation") doesn't actually count.
Give Theo and Beinfest credit, they checked with representatives from MLB's baseball operations and labor divisions for permission prior to executing the idea and they had lawyers present to just cover their tails. I really don't think there was enough smoke here for the union to cry "Fire!" in the crowded conference room. Add to all this that Orza was so delusional that he accused the Times' Murray Chass of being an "enabler of collusion" and you have a false alarm. I guess the '80s really are dead, aren't they?
For us fans of the local nine, we got to see G38 pony up for one more season in the Hub and we got to watch the second hand slowly count down until midnight Monday, the end time for the Sox' exclusive negotiating rights with Mike Lowell.
A report came out on Thursday night indicating that the Sox had made a "solid" contract offer to Lowell that included three guaranteed years and somewhere just north of $12 million per season. Unfortunately, whereas it was once thought that Lowell only needed that third year he's now rumored to be seeking a fourth and $15 million per.
Sound familiar? These numbers and years are the exact same that were thrown around in the Varitek and Damon negotiations, and we all know how that turned up. Unfortunately the other two times around the carousel were a little more clear cut in regards to their overall value. Varitek, as the catcher who handled pitchers young and old, had and effect that wasn't as easily measured on the back of his baseball card. Add to that the fact that there were at the time no real hands on the farm that could take his spot and the most scarcity of any position and you have the need to resign him, to go the extra mile. Damon, as any Idiot should tell you, was simpler still. At the top of the Sox lineup he was among the best leadoff hitters in baseball, but his biggest ability (his speed) started to wind down as he wound up into his thirties. Add to that his awful throwing arm and the ability for just about anybody to fill in passably at center field and you have less of a need. Jacoby Ellsbury was also just starting to heat up in the minors at the time, meaning that there really wouldn't be any need to lock down Damon by locking up all that money. No signing.
Lowell is a little of both. By the nature of his position he is at least, in the most limited sense, replaceable. You can take a lot of different types of infielders and turn them into league average third basemen. Whereas a lot of folks would argue that Lowell's greatest strength is his defense, in reality it's his bat and his leadership. In the clubhouse Lowell was so well-respected that Jason Varitek carried around a fan's "SIGN MIKE LOWELL" sign at the World Series parade and Curt Schilling ended his
38Pitches.com post announcing his new contract with the words:
Now the only thing that’s left is this…
SIGN MIKE LOWELL!!!!!
If the players actually echo the sentiments of Sox fans who chanted that same line immediately following the World Series win in Colorado, you've got to figure it to be true. Some would argue that his off-field intangibles make him worth any reasonable contract, and still others say that when you add his abilities at the dish he's worth anything at all.
Lowell is the kind of hitter who makes himself permanently aware of the situation. His swing adjusts based on the count, the runners on base, and the hurler on the hill. It may seem like just plain common sense that a hitter shorten his swing when in a hole or trying to knock one in, but Coco Crisp, Julio Lugo, and even Varitek himself are perfect examples of how uncommon Mike's common sense truly is. We all loved seeing a pitcher toss a waist-high fastball at him with the game on the line and the Monster looming in the distance. Wall-ball double, anyone?
Now if you're hoping for good news, this isn't really the place to find it. I love Mike Lowell. I have a total man-crush on Mike Lowell, but I'm not sure if his on-field abilities will really hold up to a four year contract. In 2007 he posted a line of .324/.378/.501 with 21 HR and 120 RBI, all impressive numbers. The trouble? A BABIP (Batting Average on Balls In Play) of .342. BABIP is a very unstable stat, dependent on so many factors that it's unlikely to ever reproduce itself from year to year. Lowell's career low BABIP is .253, posted in 2005, and his previous career high was .304, posted in 2001. His 2007 number is so far out of line with the rest of his time in the league that one can't help but think he's due for some regression to the mean.
I mean, sure, he's a great player with a swing tailor-made to pepper the wall with singles and doubles that would be outs anywhere else, but any GM worth his salt can't offer a four year deal to a 33 year old player without some hesitation. Heck, I don't care how old the player is, offering a four or five year deal to anyone based on
one season is suicide. Just ask Bill Bavasi, Adrian Beltre and the Seattle Mariners.
I want Mike Lowell to resign with the Sox as much as anyone but a fourth guaranteed year, especially at his requested $15 million, is just a little too rich for my taste. A fourth year option wouldn't be all that bad but again, $15 mil is a lot.
I wouldn't expect any sort of resolution on this until during or after the winter meetings, but let's all hope that we're happily cheering on number 25 at the hot corner in April 2008.
Labels: 2007 Offseason